How does this version stack up against Sitebulb, DeepCrawl (now Lumar), and Oncrawl?
| Feature | Screaming Frog 12.6 | Sitebulb | Lumar (Cloud) | | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | | Pricing Model | One-time fee (~$259) | Subscription (~$35/mo) | Subscription (~$500/mo) | | AI Integration | Native (GPT/Gemini) | Via API only | None | | JavaScript Crawling | Excellent (v18 Chromium) | Good (v16 Chromium) | Limited (Cloud timeout) | | URL Capacity (RAM) | 2M+ (Performance Mode) | 500k | Unlimited (Cloud) | | Privacy | 100% Local | Local + Cloud | Cloud only |
Verdict: For in-house SEOs with large, JavaScript-heavy sites and sensitive data, Screaming Frog 12.6 is currently the best value and most private solution. Screaming Frog SEO Spider 12.6
One of the most requested features has finally arrived: Crawl Comparison. Version 12.6 allows you to save baseline crawls and compare them against new crawls.
How it works:
This is a lifesaver for migrations, domain changes, or large-scale redesigns. The visual diff highlights changes in response time, word count, and internal link counts.
Structured data (Schema.org) remains a ranking factor for rich results. Version 12.6 updates its validation engine to align with Google’s 2024-2025 guidelines. The tool now flags previously tolerated errors, such as missing review objects within Product schemas or invalid itemid formats. How does this version stack up against Sitebulb,
Moreover, the new "Structured Data Preview" panel allows users to view how Google might display a rich snippet (e.g., FAQ, HowTo, Recipe) directly within the spider interface. This real-time visual feedback speeds up debugging: instead of running a URL through Google’s Rich Results Test tool individually, an SEO can scan 50,000 URLs and filter by "Valid with warnings."