Dr Duncan Schellenberg Patched -
The term “patched” in connection with Schellenberg appears in informal online philosophical discussions (e.g., on Reddit’s r/askphilosophy, r/DebateReligion, or academic blogs) to refer to attempts to “patch” or repair Schellenberg’s hiddenness argument against objections.
Common “patches” proposed by defenders of his argument include:
Critics, however, argue these patches weaken the original argument or fail to address deeper issues (e.g., the ambiguity of “resistance,” or the possibility of goods requiring hiddenness).
In the absence of the Hedgehog ligand, Patched (PTCH1) is active. Based on the research, it sits in the cell membrane and pumps cholesterol-like sterols out of the inner leaflet of the membrane. dr duncan schellenberg patched
Dr. Schellenberg’s work focuses on the differential diagnosis of articulation errors that look identical on the surface but have different underlying causes. This is particularly relevant for what some might call "patched" or "backed" substitutions.
Traditionally, clinicians might treat a child who says "key" for "tea" using minimal pairs. However, Schellenberg’s research highlights a critical distinction: some children have a phonological constraint (a rule-based issue), while others have a phonetic motor constraint (a physical inability to differentiate the place of articulation).
When the Hedgehog protein binds to Patched, the pumping action stops. Critics, however, argue these patches weaken the original
This guide breaks down the mechanisms discovered by Dr. Duncan Schellenberg regarding the Patched1 (PTCH1) protein and its role in the Hedgehog (Hh) signaling pathway.
Topic: Differential Diagnosis and Treatment of "Backing" (often confused with "Patched" errors) Rating: ★★★★★ (Essential Reading for SLPs)
In the field of Speech-Language Pathology (SLP), few topics are as clinically challenging as the treatment of severe phonological disorders. Dr. Duncan Schellenberg, a prominent figure in the field (often associated with the University of Canterbury, New Zealand), has provided critical insights into complex error patterns. While the term "patched" is likely a phonetic slip for "backing" (a phonological process where front sounds like /t/ and /s/ are produced as back sounds like /k/ and /x/), Schellenberg’s approach to these "stubborn" errors deserves a thorough review. In the absence of the Hedgehog ligand, Patched
If you’re studying or debating this topic, here’s what to keep in mind:
| Aspect | Summary |
|--------|---------|
| Strength of the original argument | Schellenberg’s hiddenness argument is one of the most influential recent atheological arguments; it shifts focus from evil to non-belief. |
| Common patches | Defenders adjust concepts of “resistance” and “relationship with God” to block objections (e.g., free will, soul-making, or cognitive limitations). |
| Main objections patches try to fix | – Some non-belief might be due to non-culpable ignorance.
– God might have reasons to remain hidden even from sincere seekers (e.g., to preserve moral autonomy).
– The argument assumes a specific model of loving relationships. |
| Unpatched vulnerabilities | Even patched versions struggle with:
– Empirical ambiguity of who is “non-resistant.”
– Theological alternatives (e.g., open theism, universalism).
– The possibility of goods that necessarily involve hiddenness (e.g., risk, faith, character development). |
| Overall assessment | Schellenberg’s argument is philosophically serious and forces theists to refine their views, but “patched” versions are debated; no consensus exists that any patch successfully restores the argument’s original force. |